This article is brought to you by:

APICS BUSINESS OUTLOOK INDEX


Prepared by APICS The Educational
Society For Resource Management
Manufacturing Activity Continues To Improve in March
March Report Highlights


The March APICS Business Outlook Index rose to 51.1 in March, up from 47.8 in February. The current component of the index increased to 50.4 from 48.8, while the future component rose to 51.9 from 46.9. The major improvement in the index stemmed from a substantial pickup in production planning for the next three months. Production also strengthened in March. With new orders outpacing shipments, unfilled orders rose substantially. On the other hand, inventory stocks remained low. Employment and shipments were little changed. A year ago, the APICS Index plunged in March because of the GM strike. While questioned at the time, this drop later turned out to be validated by government statistics. This March, with no interruptions to production, the survey figures show a robust manufacturing sector in virtually all respects. The weakness indicated in the January and February figures has disappeared. The pickup in March activity is probably tied to the strong showing of consumer spending at the beginning of the year and the weather-aided rebound in construction. Other sectors of the economy have not been especially strong: industrial capital spending remains flat, net exports are failing in response to the stronger dollar, and inventory investment is little changed. While the high-tech sector remains vibrant, the growth rate this year will probably be lower than 1996.

APICS Index Performance

Future Component Lagged 2 Months

APICS Business Outlook Index
Current Component

MONTH

SHIP

EMPL

PROD

INV

UOR

CUR
COMP

Mar 96

34.8

43.3

37.0

31.8

51.5

36.7

Apr

73.0

55.6

73.2

43.2

36.5

61.3

May

58.6

43.3

41.7

45.7

44.8

46.1

Jun

51.5

43.5

57.1

48.5

50.1

50.2

Jul

58.4

45.6

57.7

43.7

53.3

51.4

Aug

42.9

52.5

46.3

39.9

45.6

45.4

Sep

63.3

43.3

56.0

51.8

51.7

53.6

Oct

53.0

45.2

50.2

42.4

45.7

47.7

Nov

46.7

43.7

52.1

50.8

46.6

48.3

Dec

59.5

54.5

50.0

41.0

49.7

51.2

Jan 97

38.5

51.4

43.8

37.2

40.5

42.3

Feb

47.5

56.1

53.2

39.7

47.4

48.8

Mar

47.5

48.9

53.2

46.1

56.3

50.4

Future Component

MONTH NOR PRPL I/S FUT
COMP
Total
APICS
INDEX-X
Mar 96 50.0 53.6 40.9 49.0 42.9
Apr 55.6 48.4 64.2 51.2 56.2
May 40.9 46.6 48.5 45.2 45.6
Jun 51.6 51.7 47.0 50.1 50.1
Jul 55.0 51.9 58.5 54.7 53.0
Aug 43.5 53.6 47.0 47.4 46.4
Sep 56.9 54.0 53.6 54.0 53.8
Oct 50.5 55.1 51.1 50.6 49.1
Nov 41.9 49.3 43.3 45.3 46.8
Dec 55.3 47.5 57.1 52.4 51.8
Jan 97 41.7 56.5 50.7 49.6 45.9
Feb 43.6 48.4 48.8 46.9 47.8
Mar 49.3 56.5 50.0 51.9 51.1

*--Current and Future Components with equal weights

Current Conditions Component
--Manufacturing shipments rose sharply in January and February, according to the Commerce Department, increasing 1.1% and 1.4% respectively. However, the APICS Index component showed sales declining in January and flat in February. The survey also shows them flat in March. Since shipments of industrial machinery were down 1.2% in the first two months of the year, according to Commerce, but electronics were up 1.7%, it may be that the APICS survey overweighs the industrial sector and underweighs emerging companies in electronics. --Manufacturing employment was virtually unchanged in March after having risen in each of the three previous months, according to the APICS survey. Somewhat surprisingly, the BLS data showed manufacturing employment decreasing in February in spite of strong gains in shipments, orders, and production. As a result, we think the BLS figure for February manufacturing employment was understated, so it may show a sizable gain of 16,000 to 20,000 for March even though the APICS survey shows virtually no change. --Manufacturing production was expected to rise 0.3% in February; the preliminary Fed figure showed a much larger gain of 0.8%. We expect this number to be revised down. For March, the manufacturing index of industrial production is expected to rise 0.3% again. Total production should be up 0.5% to 0.6%, as utility production recovers from its temporary dip in February because of the mild winter weather. --Unfilled orders rose sharply in March, with the index increasing to 56.3. This reflects the combination of a substantial gain in inventories, coupled with no change in shipments and a further decline in inventory stocks. -Manufacturing inventory stocks remained lean in March, although the decline was less than indicated by the survey results for February. Since the Commerce Department figures generally run higher than the APICS estimates, the Commerce figure for March will probably show no change or a 0.1% increase in manufacturing inventory stocks.

Future Conditions Component
--New orders for durable goods excluding aircraft and defense were virtually unchanged in March, according to the APICS survey results. For the past two months, the survey showed a decline in orders, whereas the government figures showed a 7% gain. --The index for production planning has shown an erratic pattern lately: down in December, up sharply in January, back down in February, and up to the January level again in March. Sometimes the change in this Index is affected by production in the current month; for example, if production was unusually low this month, plans to return to normal would show a big percentage increase in the next three months. In March, however, the indexes for both actual and expected future production were well above 50. Hence we not only think that production rose 0.3% in March, but expect an average rise of 0.4% per month during the next three months. --The ratio of the actual to desired inventory/sales ratio was right at 50.0 for March, indicating neither upward nor downward pressure on inventory stocks. When combined with the low number for actual stocks, we interpret these results to mean that inventory stocks are lean, and firms plan to keep them that way

One Fed Rate Hike Not Enough To Slow The Economy
The widely advertised Fed rate hike last Tuesday sent the longawaited signal to both financial and product markets that the Fed is serious about fighting inflation. However, a 1/4% hike alone is not expected to have any measurable influence on the growth rate. As a general rule of thumb, a 1% change in interest rates results in a 1% change in growth rates starting two to three quarters later. Since the economy is currently advancing at a 4% annual rate, it would take a 1% hike in rates to slow it down to 3%. The 1/4% rate hike will probably reduce the growth rate by less than 1/4%, considering that credit availability has not changed. Now that the economy is at full employment, the Fed has made it reasonably clear that its goal is to reduce real growth to the long-term maximum sustainable rate. With the labor force growing 1% to 1<$E1/2>% per year, little change in the participation rate, and productivity probably rising 1<$E1/2>% to 2% per year (the government figures are biased downward), the maximum sustainable rate is around 3%. Hence the Fed is likely to continue tightening until the economy slows down to that rate. Over the past six months, manufacturing production has risen at a 5% annual rate, while shipments and durable goods new orders have increased slightly more than 6%, consistent with a slight increase in manufactured goods prices. Thus it is clear that manufacturing is clipping along at above average rates. It should come as no surprise that almost all of the gain has occurred In consumer goods--nondurables as well as durables--construction supplies, and electronics. By comparison, industrial equipment, inventories, and net exports have been almost flat. When interest rates rose sharply in 1994, housing eventually declined significantly, but not until the last quarter of the year. Consumer spending did not fall until the beginning of 1995, and the high-tech sector was not affected at all by higher rates. It does not seem unreasonable to call for the same pattern to develop this year, except that the rise in rates during 1994 was much greater than is currently expected. The federal funds rate rose from 3% to 6%, while the Treasury bond yield increased from 6% to 8%. Currently, the "betting odds" favor an eventual rise in the funds rate to 6% and a further increase in the Treasury bond rate to 7<$E1/2>%. If that were to reduce real growth by 1%, the 3% target would presumably be achieved. However, the 1994 experience shows that it may take a heftier dose of interest rate hikes to bring the growth back to the level desired by the Fed. While the APICS survey figures were collected before the Fed announced its rate hike, it was widely anticipated, and except for the 1/4% hike in the prime rate, probably had virtually no impact. At least this time, the Fed just wanted to fire a shot in the war against inflation to make sure everyone knew they hadn't fallen asleep at the wheel. The survey results suggest that manufacturing activity in the upcoming quarter will rise at least as rapidly as it did this quarter. That would indicate two more 1/4% point hikes in the funds rate, probably in May and August. Whether or not that slows down the economy enough for the likes of the Fed remains to be seen. But for the next two quarters, manufacturing activity should rise at above average rates.

March 27, 1997APICS The Educational Society
For Resource Management
500 West Annandale Road, Falls Church, Virginia

Sample Issue Index

You may also contact CONSENSUS at:

Consensus, Inc.
P.O. Box 411128
Kansas City, Missouri 64141
rsalva@aol.com

phone: 816-471-3862, fax 816-221-2045


Relocated 04-14-97
Last updated on 04-14-97

Hosted by:
One Crossroads Place
610 West Maple Ave, Suite WWW
Independence, MO 64050
(816) 252-4080
sysop@kcmo.com

wmeubank@ocp.kcmo.com